The HCI community has a long and successful history of evaluating its research - however, this evaluation mostly looks at usability. But how do we evaluate non-usability aspects of research?
At CHI 2018 in Montreal, we organed a Special Interest Group meeting to discuss those issues with the community. The SIG was called "Evaluating HCI Research beyond Usability" - stay in touch by joining the evaluation-hci mailing list!
Independently, we also tried to provide a first answer to the question specifically for the domain of sustainability. We developed a recipe comprising five ingredients that we believe can provide guidance to researchers in order to identify a suitable evaluation process. Those five ingredients are:
Note that this recipe is not meant to be the solution to the evaluation problem - it is just one proposal to jumpstart the discussion that we believe is overdue in our community. Read more about the difficulties of evaluating sustainability and opportunities for furthering the discussion in our paper. If you're interested in examples of how this recipe could potentially be applied to sustainability projects, check out our supplementary file. Also, don't miss our presentation at CHI!
How do we evaluate HCI research beyond usability? How to decide if a design is sustainable or creative? How to assess if a future scenario is realistic? Join the debate in our SIG at #chi2018 in Montréal! https://t.co/8Kaos82PmV @bates_oliver @jcmankoff @gulliblefish
— Christian Remy (@christianr_hci) April 13, 2018